This was done to overcome the shrinkage of part size after reaming is done. Earlier when the reamer was new the holes were within tolerance but on mid size and lower. We were not getting sufficient tool life because number of grindings (resharpenings) were getting limited. Now with the basic size higher we get sufficient number of parts with more resharpenings to make the operation economical.In a nutshell this is as goos as saying use H8 size reamer for H7 size hole!
As an interim measure it is also possible to TiN coat reamers (and build size), confirm the result and then change the tool drawing value. To meet urgency slightly undersize reamers can be coated and used .By coating the size of the tool will be marginally higher.
Same technique can be used for taps. We have a few varieties of special sizes in which the basic size of the tap is higher than standard tolerance to overcome the tendency of shrinkage (and hence lower overall tool life because we do grind taps on lead as well as flutes). In the example we are using 6H class tap for 4H quality tapping.
Since reamers are best reground between centers ( CNC machines are costly) on T&C grinder, we have many reamers with a counter bore (recessed center) to retain the center during subsequent resharpening of reamers being used for reaming of blind holes. This feature will give many more grindings on a reamer. See the attached drawing
1 comment:
Good solution. Only limitation is that the reamer cannot be radial exit thru coolant one!
My experience is that thru coolant reamers give appx 30% better tool life
Post a Comment